Home    New Releases    Coming Soon    Shop   Documents    Order Books   Subscribe    Contact Us

Mumia Abu-Jamal
Kathy Acker
Erje Ayden
Jean Baudrillard
Barbara Barg
Bernadette Corporation
Dhoruba Bin Wahad
William Burroughs
Pierre Clastres
Maurice G. Dantec
Gilles Deleuze
Jane DeLynn
Tony Duvert
Shulamith Firestone
Bob Flanagan
Michel Foucault
Eldon Garnet
Rainer Ganahl
Veronica Gonzalez
Félix Guattari
Amira Hass
Fanny Howe
Luce Irigaray
Alain Joxe
Liz Kotz
Chris Kraus
Julia Kristeva
Jurg Laederach
Sylvère Lotringer
Jean-François Lyotard
Christian Marazzi
Cookie Müeller
Heiner Müller
Eileen Myles
François Peraldi
David Rattray
Gerald Raunig
Suely Rolnik
Ann Rower
Assata Shakur
Michelle Tea
Lynne Tillman
Masha Tupitsyn
Paul Virilio
Paolo Virno
Mark von Schlegell
David Wojnarowicz
Heather Woodbury
Nina Zivancevic
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari

On The Line
Tanslated by John Johnson

The multiple must be made, not always by adding another dimension, rather in the simplest way, by dint of sobriety… A rhizome as subterranean stem is absolutely different from roots and radices. Bulbs and tubers are rhizomes… Even some animals are, in their pack forms. Rats are rhizomes. Burrows are too, in all their function of shelter, supply, movement, evasion and breakout… The rhizome includes the best and the worst: potato and couchgrass.

On the Line gathers together two seminal texts that Deleuze and Guattari would later elaborate on in A Thousand Plateaus. “Rhizome,” first presented in person at the “Schizo-Culture” conference organized by Semiotext(e) at Columbia University in 1975, introduced a new kind of thinking, both non-dialectical and non-hierarchical, that turned out paradoxically to offer an early template for the understanding of the internet. “Rhizome” substitutes pragmatic, “crab grass,” free-floating logic to the binary, oppositional, and exclusive model of the tree.
In “Politics,” superseding the Marxist concept of class, Deleuze and Guattari envisage the social macrocosm as a series of lines, and reinvent politics as a process of flux whose outcome will always be unpredictable. It is, they emphasize, the end of the idea of revolution, but not of the “becoming revolutionary.” Throughout, the two writers keep dispelling the notion of capitalism as a repressive machine only meant to extract surplus value from exploited workers and suggest that it could be opposed from within by redirecting the creativity and multiplicity of its flows.


Not Me